The personal Version of new Specialist Questionnaire (PST-Q) was developed by the Fernandez-Alvarez et al

(2003), and you may was created to assess “the latest group of properties that each and every therapist can be applied in any psychotherapeutic problem, hence framing the main top features of the brand new therapeutic work” (p. 117). The new survey assesses four different size: flexibility-tightness (Instructional subscale), distance-closeness (Expressive subscale), lesser engdecadesment-better involvement (Engagement subscale), wider concentrated-thin concentrated (Attentional subscale) and natural-organized (Medical subscale). This really is a great thirty-six-product worry about-statement scale done by practitioners with answers rated into an excellent size between step 1 (total dispute)so you can 7 (complete arrangement). The latest size shows an examination-retest reliability out-of .79, which have Chronbach’s precision coefficients for every subscale, as follows; educational, .69; expressive, .75; involvement, .78; attentional, .80; surgical, .78. Grounds Research shown a beneficial KMO = .756 (Discover Desk 1 having alphas in the current analysis).

Functioning Alliance Collection-Small Function (WAI-S)

The functional Alliance Directory (WAI), produced by Horvath Greenberg (1986), are good thirty-six item questionnaire that may be given to both readers and you will therapists which will be rated towards an effective 7-point Likert type of scale from1 (never)to eight (always). Tracey and you will Kokotovic (1989) proposed an individual and you can counselor Performing Alliance Catalog-Small Form (WAI-S), which has five items for each and every subscale (Task, Mission, and Thread) and you may full WAI-S ratings, appearing large precision which have leader profile like, plus much better than the fresh new WAI with the therapist subscales and you may complete mediocre score (Task, alpha = .83; Thread, leader = .91; Mission, alpha = .88; and you can Standard Alliance, alpha = .95). Get a hold of Dining table 1 to own alphas in the present studies.

Procedure Number (TL)

The strategy Checklist level try adapted of Hollis (1995), just who catalogued an intensive set of guidance and you can therapy processes symbolizing a broad spectrum of philosophical basics. To improve it comprehensive number according to procedure made use of specifically of the intellectual behavioral and you can constructivist procedures orientations, we recruited guidance therapy graduate people to read through the total selection of 108 cures processes and rates brand new extent that for each method is employed by cupido asexual each healing means (cognitive behavioral and you can constructivist), having fun with an excellent 5-point Likert type of size from 1 (Never or Hardly ever) to help you 5 (Constantly otherwise More often than not).


Sixteen counseling psychology graduate students participated in these ratings (six men, 10 women), with the Mage = (SD = 2.67). Results of a paired differences analysis for all 108 items indicated that there were 77 techniques rated as being used with significantly differential frequency by cognitive behavioral and constructivist therapies. We then divided this distribution of 77 techniques into quartiles and retained the top and bottom quartiles. This resulted in 20 cognitive behavioral techniques (e.g.advice giving, rational restructuring) and 20 constructivist techniques (e.g. emotional processing, reflection) that were rated most significantly different (cognitive behavioral vs. constructivist). This final list of 40 items of therapy techniques (20 cognitive behavioral techniques; 20 constructivist techniques) was used in the current study.

These types of forty affairs were detailed alphabetically and you will members was in fact questioned in order to rates new the total amount that they use for each and every techniques within practice of procedures along a great 5-section measure from one (Never otherwise Rarely)in order to 5 (Usually or More often than not). This new studies of your 20 rationalist items have been summed and you may a beneficial indicate try determined so you’re able to reflect the common volume of using rationalist treatments (possible variety = 1-5), and exact same procedure was applied regarding the fresh 20 constructivist treatments.

The fresh new brutal investigation was utilized so you can conduct a beneficial confirmatory grounds studies for the Techniques Number scale. The current study is looked at for multiple-variate normalcy plus the assumptions was basically fulfilled. Most of the kurtosis quotes toward parameters fell anywhere between step one and –step one details but constructivist issues twelve, thirteen, 16, and you will 20 and you will intellectual behavioral items 3, which in fact had a good kurtosis opinions between dos and –2. Consequently, this type of five products was in fact taken from the fresh measure before running the confirmatory foundation study.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *